{{Subject}}
Real Chemistry’s weekly analysis of biopharmaceutical pricing and value news, provided free of charge.
Real Chemistry
Value Report
April 10, 2026
President’s FY27 Budget Calls for Health Spending Cuts, Further HHS Reforms

Last Friday, President Trump issued his FY27 budget request to Congress. Under the proposal, federal health agencies’ budgets would be slashed by 12%, including steep cuts to the NIH, while requested spending for defense grew to $1.5 trillion.

No president’s budget proposal survives the gauntlet of Congressional appropriations intact. Still, proposed budget levels and requested provisions do help provide a clear signal of where the administration’s priorities lie.

For health care, the following areas of importance emerged:

  • Increased DTC advertising enforcement: For FY27, the FDA requested “additional authorities to more effectively address direct-to-consumer advertising that lacks fair balance,” calling on Congress to grant them the powers to regulate ads via legislation.
  • Keeping up with China: The FY27 budget proposal earmarks funds for the FDA to support expedited clinical trials, accelerated approvals and new incentives for companies to onshore manufacturing in America. Taken together, these measures represent an effort to close the sizeable gap emerging between the U.S. and China in biotech innovation.
  • MAHA agenda front and center: Food safety and nutrition, two key priorities for the MAHA movement and the administration ahead of the midterms, got a significant boost with $57 million to the FDA to strengthen its food safety programs and $19 million for additional nutrition services at community health centers. The budget also once again proposed creating the “Administration for a Health America,” an effort that Congress rejected in last year’s appropriations.
  • 340B reform efforts: Trump has again proposed dismantling HRSA and shifting the 340B Drug Pricing Program to CMS as part of larger HHS reorganization efforts. Notably, Congress did not support those efforts in the official FY26 budget.

Rachel Bridges, Senior Director

Payer Policy Week: Medicare Advantage Wins Relief, Prior Auth Pressures Persist

As the opening salvo of a big week in payer policy, CMS finalized the Medicare Advantage and Part D rate notice for 2027, with a 2.48% average payment increase.

This was a relief to the industry, which had expressed concerns about the sustainability of the program following the administration’s initial proposed increase of only 0.09%. After accounting for risk adjustment, the effective increase could reach 4.98%, sending more than $13 billion in additional payments to plans in 2027. The announcement also kicked the can down the road on revising risk adjustment, following significant backlash from insurers.

But the industry knows that it remains under political pressure to deliver better outcomes at lower costs. AHIP and the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association provided an update on their June 2025 commitments to streamline prior authorization, reporting that participating plans have eliminated 11% of prior authorization requirements overall. That decrease equates to 6.5 million fewer requests, including a 15% reduction in Medicare Advantage. Analysis of the prior authorization data submitted to CMS is reportedly harder to interpret, making it difficult to see how different payers stack up on continued prior authorization requirements.

N.B. Of course, CMS announced a proposed rule to reduce prior authorizations for prescription drugs right as this edition was being finalized. More to come from us next week.

Megan Hickey, Managing Director

Breaking Down the U.S./UK “Arrangement” on Drug Pricing

The breaking news of U.S. pharmaceutical tariffs largely overshadowed the announcement of one of its major exemptions. On April 2, the U.S. and the United Kingdom announced an “arrangement” that will reshape drug pricing, spending and access in Britain.

While principles for the partnership were established four months ago, last week’s update confirmed and clarified key details.

  • Tariffs: The U.K. becomes the first country to secure a 0% tariff rate on its biopharma exports to the U.S., an exemption good for at least three years.
  • Spending: The National Health Service commits to incrementally raise spending on new medicines from 0.3% of GDP to at least 0.6% by the end of 2036. NHS will also increase the percentage of its budget spent on medicines to 12% by 2036, up from 10% at present.
  • Rebate Cap: The agreement places a cap of 15% on rebates applied through the nation’s voluntary pricing scheme. The maximum rate was previously 23%, and the reduced rate will apply until renegotiations in 2028.
  • NICE: The U.K.’s HTA body, NICE, has increased cost-effectiveness thresholds from between £20,000 and £30,000 ($26,912 and $40,368) to between £25,000 and £35,000 ($33,640 and $47,096). Two cancer medicines have already received authorization in the U.K. under the revised approach.
  • MFN: In terms still open for interpretation, the U.S. commits that new most-favored nation drug pricing models will not be “designed in a way that uniquely disadvantages the United Kingdom.” In kind, the U.S. “expects pharmaceutical companies to continue to launch new medicines” in Britain despite concerns from drugmakers.

With a deal in hand and changes underway, U.K. officials are urging pharmaceutical firms to resume investment in the region after several high-profile withdrawals last year. Hailed by proponents as a “win for British patients and the economy, critics warn that increased spending may not reap intended results. Said one expert: “The maths simply does not add up.”

Andrew Wishon, Editor-in-Chief

Circled on Our Calendar
Quotes of the Week
  • “If we want to build a healthcare system that is accessible, affordable and worthy of our friends and family, we need to band together – consumers, patients, employers and every level of government – to make it clear that the status quo is unacceptable.” – Paul Markovich, MarketWatch
  • “Those of us working in HIV immediately feared that lenacapavir would become another medical miracle whose impact on the epidemic would be delayed for years while access slowly expanded and prices gradually fell. History has taught us this pattern well. But history also offers another path: subscription pricing.” – Dr. Michael Rose, STAT
  • “The correct answer to the question of why spending levels in the U.S. are higher than in other countries may be, ‘It’s the prices, stupid.’ But that may be the wrong answer to the question of why spending in the U.S. is rising.” – Michael E. Chernew, Health Affairs Forefront
Other News
See you next week …
–  Real Chemistry
Know a friend or colleague that would enjoy the Value Report?
Invite them to sign up here.
© Real Chemistry, All Rights Reserved.